![]() |
|
![]() |
Sankaran Naren, Fund Manager, ICICI Prudential Infrastructure fund shares his views on the fund.
With talks of an ambitious amount of US$1 trillion being allocated for infrastructure development in the twelfth five-year plan, the infrastructure sector seems to hold great promise for the long term. Increases in the budgetary expenditures targeted for the sector over the past years have paved the path for better roads and improved power supply albeit with limited success. This year the government has provided another Rs. 20,000 of tax deduction to individual investors to support infrastructure financing. Nevertheless, the sector’s one year returns have lagged behind Automobiles, Information Technology and Metals. In order to gain more insight into the sector, we interview Mr Sankaran Naren, the fund manager of ICICI Prudential Infrastructure Fund, which is featured in Recommended Funds section. “If there had been a complete withdrawal of fiscal stimulus, then we were looking at a change in strategy”, opines Mr Naren while talking about impact of Union Budget on the fund. Key Points from the interview
Dhanashri Rane (DR): As of 31 December 2009, the fund has outperformed its peers. What are some of the factors that have contributed to the fund’s performance? Sankaren Naren (SN): The fund has been maintaining a large-cap bias over the last two years and the same has contributed to the fund’s performance. In addition, we have used derivatives exposure to tide over volatility and the same has worked in favour of the fund.
DR: Would there be a change in the investment strategy of the fund post the budget? If so then why? SN: No, however if there had been a complete withdrawal of fiscal stimulus, then we were looking at a change in strategy.
DR: According to you, what is the expected amount of investment into the infrastructure space in the coming decade? How much of it will be raised from the capital markets? SN: Ramping up investments in infrastructure is critical for India’s growth, and its sustainability. Supporting infrastructure investment is particularly important at this time, not just to sustain total domestic demand at a time of global crisis, but also to lay the foundations for stronger economic growth in the future. The strong population growth in India and its booming economy are generating enormous pressures to modernise and expand India’s infrastructure. The creation of world-class infrastructure would require large investments in addressing the deficit in quality and quantity. The very fact that the government in the Eleventh five-year plan (FY 2007-12) estimates that investments to the tune of US$492 billion are needed during the five-year period is a mere indication of the likely investments that would follow over the coming decade.
DR: Within the infrastructure space, which are your favourite sectors? Why? SN: Within the infrastructure space, we maintain a positive bias towards sectors such as Telecom and regulated power having substantial operating power plants.
DR: With many new entrants in the power generation sector and the power sector being very capital intensive while also requiring long gestation periods, do you think the power generation sector is getting overcrowded? SN: We believe that merchant power prices are likely to go down only over a period of time. Consequently, the short-term outlook is positive for the sector. Power is a basic necessity that is in shortage in India.
DR: Even though the focus of the government has been on the infrastructure sector, the corporate results for companies haven’t been encouraging due to execution issues. What is your outlook for the sector and do you see the earnings growth improving? SN: In some cases like construction, execution issues have been a problem. In our view, the same is likely to happen as execution of projects would be subsequent to necessary approvals. That being said, we believe that funding constraints would come down with the complete withdrawal of stimulus.
DR: Can you give us an example of an investment decision that turned out well and one that didn’t do so well? SN: The decision to stay out of the booming real estate sector in 2007 and the decision to cut our exposure to mid-cap turned out to be a good decision as the same contributed to the fund’s performance. On the other side, our conservative approach during March 2009 to May2009 has hurt the fund.
|
||||
Email your feedback: content.in@ifastfinancial.com | ||||
The Content Team is part of iFAST Financial India Pvt Ltd |
||||
iFAST and/or its content and research team’s licensed representatives may own or have positions in the mutual funds of any of the Asset Management Company mentioned or referred to in the article, and may from time to time add or dispose of, or be materially interested in any such. This article is not to be construed as an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of any mutual fund. No investment decision should be taken without first viewing a mutual fund's offer document/scheme additional information/scheme information document. Any advice herein is made on a general basis and does not take into account the specific investment objectives of the specific person or group of persons. Investors should seek for professional investment, tax, and legal advice before making an investment or any other decision. Past performance and any forecast is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of the mutual fund. The value of mutual funds and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Please read our disclaimer in the website. | ||||
|